BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
Home
|
Profile
|
Register
|
Active Topics
|
Members
|
Search
|
FAQ
All Forums
eXtreme Music Manager
Bugs Report
Completely wrong way
Note:
Only the poster of this message, and the Moderator can edit the message.
Screensize:
640 x 480
800 x 600
1024 x 768
1280 x 1024
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Basic
Help
Prompt
Format:
Font
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Lucida Console
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Verdana
Size
1
2
3
4
5
6
Color
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Forum:
Bugs Report
Subject:
Message:
* HTML is OFF
*
Forum Code
is ON
Smilies
I hate to say that, but creating XMuM album driven is completely wrong and makes more problems than advantages (if three are any?). Best example is the album title "Greatest Hits". All entries in albums grid are "merged" under the first AlbumID. In my case 47 artists! Btw. it takes about 5 MINUTES to show the album card! And the tracks are not shown - Out Of Memory Exception... I think that an artist driven database like all other progs are the only effective way. XMuM should be modified in that way or it's "not useable" on large collections. *Edit* This crappy result took more than 24 hours of work on nearly 80.000 entries. It was a complete waste of time [:(!] On the second screenshot you can see the result on album title "Live" with less enough tracks to be shown. Even not a satisfying result, too. [img]http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/58c981902d485514995ed273d83f5079ca7f9810f8cb66987080a3ef0947f6536g.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/58654e2aeba2498688f5ff9ab7c89a32cc7290faeae8639625d56a7c707e01cd6g.jpg[/img]
Check here to include your profile signature.
BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
© Binaryworks.it
Generated in 0.02 sec.