BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 eXtreme Music Manager
 Bugs Report
 Completely wrong way

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
JDommi Posted - 15 Oct 2011 : 13:16:28
I hate to say that, but creating XMuM album driven is completely wrong and makes more problems than advantages (if three are any?).
Best example is the album title "Greatest Hits". All entries in albums grid are "merged" under the first AlbumID. In my case 47 artists!
Btw. it takes about 5 MINUTES to show the album card! And the tracks are not shown - Out Of Memory Exception...
I think that an artist driven database like all other progs are the only effective way. XMuM should be modified in that way or it's "not useable" on large collections.

*Edit*
This crappy result took more than 24 hours of work on nearly 80.000 entries. It was a complete waste of time
On the second screenshot you can see the result on album title "Live" with less enough tracks to be shown. Even not a satisfying result, too.




BinaryWorks.it Official Forum © Binaryworks.it Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.06 sec. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07