| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
 Posted - 25 Oct 2016 : 21:49:24
|
It seems as if this release has a bug in the full installation.
Please load this release http://www.binaryworks.it/download.asp?file=extrememm9.0.0.5.exe and do the update to release 9.0.0.7. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
 |
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 29 Oct 2016 : 16:50:14
|
Do you have downloaded the previous version at first as suggested?
After that you can use the update function in XMM.
This trick has done it for another user and for me, too. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 30 Oct 2016 : 14:15:00
|
I have already done, but still leaving the errors, the debug exception and error exceeded the system resources ...
I removed all the options file and folder that can slow XMM, I can not think of anything to look .....
And the computer will not be, I've changed, so I have reinstalled everything from scratch, is an I7 with 32 GB of RAM, SSD HD ...., what I have are pedals |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 30 Oct 2016 : 15:26:40
|
Does the older release work correctly?
If not then there must be missing anything in your system.
Anyway I have written an email to Ale if he can help. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 01 Nov 2016 : 12:37:01
|
I think to remember that some time ago the same or a similar error occured for a user - not the one you mentioned above.
Maybe you can perform a search for as I don't have the time at the moment as I'm @work. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 01 Nov 2016 : 17:50:32
|
It is one that refers to the size of the DB?
But they talk if not translate wrong, on the XMM 64b |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 01 Nov 2016 : 18:26:18
|
| Well, I don't remember. Maybe you're right... |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 01 Nov 2016 : 21:11:37
|
From what I understand the error is similar, mmm ... my DB is 950MB with 5400 movies and 96400 actors, I do not think it manages by xmm lo size SQLite, I believe, if so theoretically SQLite allows up to 2 terabytes.
I'll try reviewing the features of Windows, which perhaps lacks something, |
Edited by - washandgo on 02 Nov 2016 14:06:08 |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 02 Nov 2016 : 19:56:26
|
I have found that size does matter, at my age.
I created a new database, adding records and behaves great, so will play split the database, create an index and 20 DB by Genres, for example . |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 02 Nov 2016 : 20:38:33
|
Well, that's M$ Access.
I wonder if it would be a problem to convert to sql or if there is a problem on user side.
I think programatically there is no difference except the database opening procedure. I have "played" with a Helium Music Manager database in SQLExpress myself but it was only reading and writing a few datafields. And I'm not really a database expert as I can say something to the difficulties... |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 02 Nov 2016 : 21:44:12
|
| I'm not expert in DB, but from what I've been reading, to change .mdb to .accdb or .accde, is simple with the same access, I've switched to accdb with a click, but no clear XMM read access after 2003. from what I understood is moved over 2GB sizes without memo fields and objects. |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 03 Nov 2016 : 07:26:55
|
| 2 GiB is the limit of every Access version as far as I know. Therefor Access is out of date for every big database. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 03 Nov 2016 : 20:37:12
|
If 2 GB but keep in mind that the DB has about 40 tables and the principal has more than 100 fields, clear to reaching the Gb slows down and gives exception errors and failures of system resources.
That's what I've come to understand from what I've read, it is a function of the assembly, also there was one that said that up to 5 million entered records did very well with 10 million work and 17 million gave mistakes, but it was a simple and DB 15 fields. |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 03 Nov 2016 : 21:22:03
|
| I don't really know. And it's needless to discuss as Ale surely don't change anything on that. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
washandgo
Junior Member
Spain
257 Posts |
Posted - 04 Nov 2016 : 21:50:16
|
I'm thinking of a way to divide the DB and I thought of making a DB index, title, year, main genre, cover and actors only the name and photo. And then make a DB by gender, I have only 20 main genres, so I would have 21 DB, the system is to copy 20 times the DB with folders cover and rename and go eliminating the movies that are not of that genre.
I have to think a little more this ... |
|
|
|
JDommi
Administrator
Germany
4656 Posts |
Posted - 05 Nov 2016 : 01:39:00
|
For my "small" collections there is only a devide between Movies and TVShows neccessary. And of course a limit of 12 actors without their filmography and awards. In most cases a limit of 4 or 8 actors for the main cast would really be enough.
20 main genres... wouldn't be the half enough? Action, Crime, SF, Drama, Comedy, Fantasy, Horror, Adventure, Martial Arts and Western. Music(al), Biography and Documentaries/Travel are optional for another database... Keep in mind that too many different databases will sometimes result in endless searches. As example the movies of "Jesse Stone" with Tom Selleck - are they better sorted as crime or as a series? Where the categorisation is not really clear it's always difficult to keep a plain and simple order. |
In order to achieve what is possible, you have to try the impossible over and over again.
Hermann Hesse |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
I have an error