BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
BinaryWorks.it Official Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 eXtreme Movie Manager 8, 9, 10 Forum
 Suggestions / New Features
 Watchdog for HDD

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
rick69 Posted - 23 Nov 2012 : 17:42:57
Hi

A watchdog for movies on HDD ar verry good to find canceled movies or erroneous data or exchange data.

example :

I move the movie "Blade" from folder "unseen" to Folder "seen".

D:\unseen\blade.avi to
D:\seen\blade.avi

EMM must this identifi

greetings rick
12   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
rick69 Posted - 29 Jan 2013 : 17:35:35
Hi Ale

gibt es schon eine Idee?
Have you an idea?


greetings rick
Alessio Viti Posted - 10 Jan 2013 : 11:35:42
Hello Guys,

I will try to make some tests...

Ale
rick69 Posted - 10 Jan 2013 : 07:55:42
Hi
Genau: Die Sortierung der Filme sollte über MediaLabel erfolgen.
Der Laufwerksbuchstaben sollte als Variable programmiert werden.

by rick


Hi
Exactly: The sort of films should be about MediaLabel.
The drive letter should be programmed as a variable.

by rick




JustME Posted - 09 Jan 2013 : 19:49:35
so in my case I have multiple drives and they are all connected via USB.
They are all mapped as drive Z and only have the drive name different (External 1 to External 27 now).
If we scanned the drive every time it would show some as missing because the drive wasn't connected.
so this adds a complication to Ale to try to please everyone.
Originally I did each drive by a different drive letter but I ran out of options doing it that way..so scanning by media label (all different in my scenario) works fine....I also filter by media label
rick69 Posted - 07 Jan 2013 : 16:33:23
Proplems with move movies from HDD1 to HDD2.
The MediaLabel is from HDD1. The movie is on HDD2 (play movie is in funktion)


by rick
rick69 Posted - 07 Jan 2013 : 10:25:28
Hi Ale
I think it would be A singel button to find defunct movies on HDD is better.
When you to use many HDDs, you must say "scan (media-label)HDD to losed movies.

by rick
rick69 Posted - 03 Jan 2013 : 14:29:36
Hi Ale
This funktion is very good .

Proplems:
when you have "duplicate Name"(movies)in the database and many harddrives
(to imply a request of MediaLabel, movie ID, Media, FileSize)for better Identify

Greetings and best wishes

rick69

i love your good work

Alessio Viti Posted - 21 Dec 2012 : 17:19:41
Hello Rick,

Please let me know if you have add the two Folders:

D:\unseen\blade.avi to
D:\seen\blade.avi

in the Device Scanner configuration!

Ale
rick69 Posted - 18 Dec 2012 : 12:34:44
HI
Hilfe: Die Antwort kann ich nur auf Deutsch.

Überwachung funktioniert.
Vorraussetzung: der Laufwerksscanner ist beim Programmstart eingeschaltet.
Neue Filme werden sofort erkannt.
Ist keine Festplatte angeschlossen logisch, werden keine Fehlenden Filme erkannt.
stecke ich eine Festplatte an, dann zeigt XMM alle Filme der Nichtangeschlossenen Festplatten als fehlend an.
Mann müste die Erkennung (z.B. Medialabel) mit einbeziehen um auch nur die Filme der Angeschlossenen Festplatte zu bearbeiten.
Macht sonst keinen sinn

Danke Rick
Alessio Viti Posted - 06 Dec 2012 : 21:13:42
Hello Rick,

Sorry for delay... have you add these 2 folders to Device Scanner? because XMM should automatically detect that you have move the file.

Please let me know,

Ale
JDommi Posted - 05 Dec 2012 : 09:52:52
Well, that's a good idea. But not easy to implement. XMM has to compare with name (could be changed) and filesize (rare but can differ, too). Reading the codec info, I don't know, but there could exist different movies with same info. Maybe a hash checksum will resolve that. But then you have to generate it for all movies and you have to compare it with "no longer" existing movies in your database. As solution I would prefer a combination of the checksum and a manually comparison by a generated list where the user at the end of a scan has to chose which of those old/new movies really are the same.
rick69 Posted - 05 Dec 2012 : 08:41:00
uninteresting ?

BinaryWorks.it Official Forum © Binaryworks.it Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.08 sec. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07